 Online dating cultural standards are very unconventional, meaning that if you learn the entire cyber-culture, you’d be surprised to find out how standards of dating are not the same as in “real” life where no one has the luxury of such an abundance of options available to you for relevant effective filtering. Now everything is changing; online culture is becoming a more advanced way of establishing meaningful relations. Ideally, most compatible relationships are defined by when you meet someone who matches all of these common bonds that connect to each other intellectually (by mental attraction), emotionally (by personal attraction) and physically (by certain types of physical features that arouse affinity or naturally high attraction). Those attractive traits tend to be mutually desirable as well as biochemically compatible, so that you could easily get used to identifying your own type. Affinity does not have to be strictly physical or visual – there could also be a natural, compatible reaction among personalities that would cause a high level of attraction capable of exceeding even the biochemical/physical levels. Literally, everyone has their own favorite type that would make them always feel like a lucky-spunky, happy camper. To maintain the happiest stable relationship you don’t really have to be knowledgeable about all of those complex compatibility dynamics with a natural tendency derivative from universal laws, sociology, karma and so forth.. No one needs to make it even more confusing, otherwise you’d be overwhelmed by cynically antagonizing yourself with cold, logical reasoning not allowing you to love someone who genuinely deserves your affection. So, what constitutes a more beautiful relationship?…  Online dating cultural standards are very unconventional, meaning that if you learn the entire cyber-culture, you’d be surprised to find out how standards of dating are not the same as in “real” life where no one has the luxury of such an abundance of options available to you for relevant effective filtering. Now everything is changing; online culture is becoming a more advanced way of establishing meaningful relations. Ideally, most compatible relationships are defined by when you meet someone who matches all of these common bonds that connect to each other intellectually (by mental attraction), emotionally (by personal attraction) and physically (by certain types of physical features that arouse affinity or naturally high attraction). Those attractive traits tend to be mutually desirable as well as biochemically compatible, so that you could easily get used to identifying your own type. Affinity does not have to be strictly physical or visual – there could also be a natural, compatible reaction among personalities that would cause a high level of attraction capable of exceeding even the biochemical/physical levels.
Literally, everyone has their own favorite type that would make them always feel like a lucky-spunky, happy camper. To maintain the happiest stable relationship you don’t really have to be knowledgeable about all of those complex compatibility dynamics with a natural tendency derivative from universal laws, sociology, karma and so forth.. No one needs to make it even more confusing, otherwise you’d be overwhelmed by cynically antagonizing yourself with cold, logical reasoning not allowing you to love someone who genuinely deserves your affection. So, what constitutes a more beautiful relationship?… Building a friendship foundation on multi-media cyber-dating is not the easiest thing but it can be highly rewarding assuming you’re dealing with among the best matches.The best safest way to approach a potential relationship is to get to know the person before you consider meeting offline. Don’t ever rush into anything and don’t ever have grand illusions (no matter how desperate it can be) – you’ll be proud of yourself later. Online relations have a natural tendency of either evolving into only a friendship (with many things in common), recreational (only having fun together/low commitment), real dating (short-term/medium commitment), or marriage (long-term/family/high commitment) and/or even professional (long-term or short-term mutual career interest). It’s actually “rocket science” to attempt matching yourself up to the Best Match with the odds of meeting one in person of about once every 5-7 years (or never). Vast majority never find their best match, because it is such a rare and surreal phenomenon to experience. Whoever is the lucky one to encounter their best-matching partner, will more likely decide to keep the one for life, since by the laws of loyal harmonic synergy, their ideal combination of social justice connection will be acting like a boundary-limit that no one can surpass by compatibility, adoration, compassion, essential values / priorities, HARMONY in lifestyles and optimal amount of mutual interests. Strong, lasting common bonds would create a very inspiring level of happiness that may resemble the surreal mood like delirious. This kind of an empowering MEGA-MATCH can also be more challenging to maintain but ultimately for the few lucky ones it will be among the most enjoyable, most special companions ever in their life… Unlike the Great Match that comes every 3-4 years into your life assuming IF you keep on looking. It would be still quite exciting, beneficial and practical to have this highly compelling special person who’d be a good influence on your mutual happiness in a strong long-term bond that becomes durable and also very desirable by most people for a more realistic very compatible match of impressively great balance of interdependence with enough counterbalance to maintain the dynamic. Except for the ultra-fussy hopeless romantics who are on their eternal quest to find a ‘perfect’ soulmate that does not really exist, almost NO ONE is disappointed when they stumble upon someone like that, trying to make the best of the matching partner potential by REFINING it to be as close to the best match is one can be. Or there is also the Good Match that you can meet within a year of shmoozing around. In this scenario, most people are willing to settle for a short-term and maybe even a long-term relation but things may not be as exciting as with the better-matching companions. It will be apparent when there is a tad lower trust, lower interest in each others’ activities, hobbies or professions, lower admiration, less interdependence and more CO-dependence with a mild lack of reciprocation. More likely it would feel happy enough yet in a more political, slightly artificial way, although it can still be livable around that person. And of course there is always the Mediocre Match that you can find and meet in person within one month after joining any online dating site. NEVER settle on this one, because it will never last and you will never be happy due to the unfavorable social dynamics of debility that will be stifling your potential to flourish in a healthy relationship of utmost motivation to attain the TRUE HAPPINESS with the true love!!! [sociological scientific studies and data were from Dec, 2010] Author: Yuri Sire / Date: Jan 16, 2012
1 Comment
|
AuthorYuri Sire at times writes PR blogs for companies and individuals as well as his own company ventures. Archives
March 2020
Categories |
RSS Feed